| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Vitali |
Posted - 24/02/2013 : 12:13:14
239.46 KB
China, Guangxi.
27 mm.
Does it belong to Neocerambyx? |
| 8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Francesco |
Posted - 04/10/2013 : 09:51:37
Ah! 
Merci Gérard!
On va faire l'article? |
| Gerard |
Posted - 03/10/2013 : 22:52:18
Ici le Type de Pseudopachydissus rufofemoralis Pic, 1933 photographié au MNHN-Paris
It seems to me to correspond; however, my specimen of Vietnam is another species. |
| Vitali |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:33:21
Exactly! That is what I was trying to say. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 10:50:41
Yes, but in Neocerambyx it should reach this region too.
Instead we have a ridge like in Aeolesthes.
42.74 KB
quote:
Originally posted by Vitali
Fore coxal cavities seem also rounded or slightly angulated.
This character also does not correspond to Neocerambyx. |
| Vitali |
Posted - 07/03/2013 : 23:16:19
In my beetle this is a deep furrow with pretty sharp edges between the upper lobes of eyes (shown by a red arrow).
Fore coxal cavities seem also rounded or slightly angulated.
22.84 KB |
| Francesco |
Posted - 02/03/2013 : 12:56:40
J'ai enfin déplacé ici ce topic.
J'ai eu l'occasion d'acheter (malheureusement) une femelle de cette espèce, ou mieux de celle postée par Gerard.
Entre les yeux, en effet, il n'a pas un sillon, mais une carène.
Donc il ne s'agit pas d'un Neocerambyx, mais d'un nouveau genre, encore à décrire, proche de Aeolesthes. |
| Vitali |
Posted - 24/02/2013 : 15:23:18
Thank you, Gerard.
Of course I compared to your beetle before I placed a photo of mine, but I found too many differences: the sculpture of pronotum and head is different, the tips of elytra too, antennae are completely different, ends of tibia black... |
| Gerard |
Posted - 24/02/2013 : 12:39:28
Good morning look at this post.
Your animal seems to me different at the level of the streaks of pronotum and the apex of the elytra, which is not prickly.
|
