| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Gyula |
Posted - 15/03/2013 : 12:57:37
379.01 KB
Irán, Emam koli
21 mm |
| 6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| znort |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 19:17:43
ok thank you francesco
|
| Francesco |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 14:51:28
Cerambyx cinereus Fabricius, 1792 is preoccupied by Cerambyx cinereus DeGeer, 1775.
The name Diorthus simplex was validly used by Gahan (1906: 133); therefore, one of the conditions for the ICZN 23.9. (Reversal of precedence) can not be met.
In fact, "the senior synonym or homonym has not been used as a valid name after 1899" (Art. 23.9.1.1.)
|
| znort |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 13:39:33
In Löbl & Smetana it's always cinereus..
Why you use simplex Francesco? |
| Gyula |
Posted - 17/03/2013 : 06:43:31
thank you |
| Francesco |
Posted - 16/03/2013 : 18:31:02
I agree, but the correct name is Diorthus simplex (White, 1853). |
| znort |
Posted - 16/03/2013 : 16:26:45
I think it's probably Diorthus cinereus (Fabricius, 1792) |
