| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| dryobius |
Posted - 14/06/2017 : 05:57:54
453.22 KB
50 mm
|
| 4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Francesco |
Posted - 17/06/2017 : 08:18:00
Indeed: it is a female of Neocerambyx grandis Gahan, 1891. |
| dryobius |
Posted - 16/06/2017 : 04:22:31
I don't agree with N. katarinae.
I have a pair given to me by Holzschuh a few years. I find some significant differences: the ratio of body length to width, the pronotal sculpturing. the shape of the scutellum and the shape of the antennal segments, especially the 3rd and 4th. Also the specimens which he gave to me are much longer.
I think my bad photograph does not help anybody. |
| Gerard |
Posted - 14/06/2017 : 19:26:03
Ok pour N. katarinae  |
| Pierre |
Posted - 14/06/2017 : 07:30:55
Neocerambyx katarinae Holzschuh, 2009, female |
