T O P I C R E V I E W |
Xavier |
Posted - 17/03/2013 : 12:44:26
Here a specimen from China, Xizang Chayu, Zhuowagong, 2500 m (Thank you, BI ) |
15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Xavier |
Posted - 15/05/2018 : 18:34:12 So, I was right, it is not Rhaphuma nishidai but a new species just described : Rhaphuma parvipilosa Holzschuh, 2018 |
Xavier |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 19:29:39 Thanks all guys for your help |
horshehden |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 18:29:35 It is in your hand, so you should know more:) |
Xavier |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 09:27:20 Really, I do not know. I see some differences with the description of Rhaphuma nishidai : no suberect hairs on the pronotum or neither elytra, only the half basal part of the thorax brownish-black, and short spines on 4th antennomera ( so, it should be a Demonax sp. ?? ). Legs color is uniform, no darker or lighter in parts as said in description.
|
Xaurus |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 01:22:07 for me this is R. nishidai too, I think only the females have a spine at the underside of the 3rd antennal segment --> again the known problem within the genera Rhaphuma and Demonax, also Demonax tryznai Viktora, 2015 is very similar, only a bit darker, why this sps isn't compared with R. nishidai and R. aranea by Viktora (2015) |
horshehden |
Posted - 13/10/2015 : 17:03:36 According to the paper, black is thorax, ie body. Not pronotum, which has the same colour as elytra. |
Xavier |
Posted - 12/10/2015 : 23:49:02 I just told you : in the description !
HAYASHI Masao & MAKIHARA Hiroshi, 1981. The Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Nepal collected by the Kyushu University Scientific Expedition. Esakia, Fukuoka (17): 183-200, 34 figs.
|
horshehden |
Posted - 12/10/2015 : 22:58:17 Where do you see it? |
Xavier |
Posted - 12/10/2015 : 11:22:03 quote: Originally posted by horshehden
Rather R. nishidai? At least, I have determined my specimen from the same area as such.
In the description text, Rhaphuma nishidai Hayashi & Makihara, 1981 has black pronotum and " antenna short", "antenna shorter than the body", etc, so I do not think it is this species. |
horshehden |
Posted - 28/09/2015 : 19:06:55 Rather R. nishidai? At least, I have determined my specimen from the same area as such. |
Xavier |
Posted - 28/09/2015 : 17:37:47 quote: Originally posted by BinLiu
Hi,Xavier,the locality is misspell,it should be Zhuwagen(ΦρΝίΈω),is a township of Chayu area.
Thanks my friend |
nasa |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 19:01:53 quote: Originally posted by Xavier
Thanks, I check both.
I also have some specimens from Northwest Yunnan. |
BinLiu |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 16:42:55 Hi Xavier, the locality is misspell, it should be Zhuwagen (ΦρΝίΈω), is a township of Chayu area. |
Xavier |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 07:23:02 Thanks, I check both. |
Xaurus |
Posted - 24/09/2015 : 23:36:14 For me R. aranea Holzschuh, 1984 or R. nishidai Hayashi & Makihara, 1981 ! |