| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Max |
Posted - 20/02/2012 : 17:20:18
Help me, please, with this Chlorophorus.
From south Vietnam, Lam Dong province, female, 16 mm.
I ran out of ideas on this count..  |
| 13 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 09/10/2020 : 20:44:46
Thanks a lot, Ping ! |
| woshixiao |
Posted - 09/10/2020 : 08:50:49
Paper at the link below.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qjqgbwoz8jdra7h/2020-Viktora-New%20Clytini%20from%20Palaearctic%20and%20Oriental%20Regions.pdf?dl=0 |
| Vitali |
Posted - 05/10/2020 : 19:17:03
Sorry, not yet. This journal number is not yet online for some reason. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/10/2020 : 18:02:06
Ok, but the true question is "do you have the paper ?" |
| Vitali |
Posted - 05/10/2020 : 13:23:56
Evermighty Titan:
VIKTORA Petr, 2020. New Clytini from Palaearctic and Oriental Regions (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae) Folia Heyrovskyana, Praha (Series A) 28 (1): 103-154 |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/10/2020 : 12:37:57
Why not.
Do you have the title of the paper ? |
| woshixiao |
Posted - 05/10/2020 : 05:10:09
why not Chlorophorus prodromus Viktora, 2020, it also comes from Lam Dong. |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 04/10/2020 : 23:30:47
why not Chlorophorus douei (Chevrolat, 1863) atleast very similar. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 03/10/2020 : 12:02:52
Because I wonder if your specimen really comes from Vietnam (as some others species from "Dambri"), I wonder if it is Chlorophorus malaccanus Pic, 1925 that I only knows from description.
|
| Max |
Posted - 28/02/2012 : 23:16:15
I agree, it something other... Thanks. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 28/02/2012 : 22:53:33
Yes... unfortunately, it is not this species: the description might be confused but the type is very different. |
| Max |
Posted - 22/02/2012 : 22:25:11
Thanks for your time, Francesco! |
| Francesco |
Posted - 22/02/2012 : 22:06:46
By basing on the differential diagnosis of C. bonengensis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970, it might be C. hainanicus Gressitt, 1940.
I do not really know such species. |
