Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Cerambycinae
 Trachyderini
 Trachyderes Ecuador: leptomerus batesi

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Pierre Posted - 29/05/2011 : 09:03:11



I would say: Trachyderes leptomerus.
As they come from Ecuador, could they belong to the ssp. batesi?
25/29 mm
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Francesco Posted - 29/05/2011 : 20:32:14
OK; also pubescent.
The alternative is pacificus Hüdepohl or leptomerus Aurivillius, according to the shape of the third antennomere: normal (pacificus) or thickened at the apex (leptomerus).
If you confront the images of Bezark's site is leptomerus. In this case, Trachyderes leptomerus batesi Martins, 1975... as you already knew.
Pierre Posted - 29/05/2011 : 19:40:53
All depends what you call smooth or pubescent... but here I see sparse long setae on the whole underside of the pronotum. Also in this furrow.
Francesco Posted - 29/05/2011 : 18:31:44

Possibly.
In order to exclude some forms of succintus, it is necessary to check if the prosternal furrow is pubescent or not.
In the succintus-females it is completely smooth.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07