Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Small tribes of Lamiinae
 South Africa, Cloniocerus

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Larry Bezark Posted - 05/11/2013 : 02:01:27


Cape Province South Africa
13-14mm
6   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Jérôme Sudre Posted - 14/10/2018 : 21:58:48
good evening

With its antennas it looks a lot like aureovittatus however at aureovittatus (which I have the photo of the type) the presence as here of a brush of hair is very clear whereas at these brushes albosticticus ([I do not know the species! I have a photo of an ex that I assimilated to albosticticus) nothing is said about it? On the other hand the description specifies that there is only one fascicle on elytra (post-basilar disc) and no other.
I especially have the impression that the fascicles of hairs are much less marked than in Aureovittatus by the way the antennas at albosticticus the antennas are very clearly stretched contrary to aureovittatus or they are much less ...
The white pubescence on the sides of the pronotum is very distinct here and on the albosticticus, whereas in aureovittatus this lateral color is rather yellowish. So it looks like albosticticus but look maybe also on the side of C hystrix F?

Francesco Posted - 14/10/2018 : 17:47:14
Thank you very much Riana.

I think that this is the true albosticticus (antennae fit), while this should be aureovittatus.
Larry's specimen should be aureovittatus.
Your opinions?
Riana Posted - 14/10/2018 : 16:32:34
Here is the description of Cloniocerus aureovittatus Breuning, 1955


45.32 KB
Francesco Posted - 14/10/2018 : 16:00:07
Sorry Larry but I was wrong.
This should be Cloniocerus albosticticus Breuning, 1940 or C. aureovittatus Breuning, 1955 (I do not have the description of the latter species).

C. kraussi shows a postmedian yellowish band (here).

In addition, the C. kraussi of the site Lamiaires du Monde (Roguet's picture in your site) is actually C. bohemanni.
Larry Bezark Posted - 05/11/2013 : 22:14:11
Thank you Francesco

Francesco Posted - 05/11/2013 : 21:13:16
Cloniocerus kraussii White, 1855

Here te original picture of this species:


Cloniocerus kraussii White, 1855: Pl. X, Fig. 8

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07