| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Larry Bezark |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 20:00:05
104.74 KB
Xaignabouri, Laos
Looks similar to Epipedocera subundulata Gressitt & Rondon 1970 but without the subapical band. |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| longyun |
Posted - 08/08/2018 : 04:02:39
I do not know who has it.
But look at photos from Laos (vitalisi) and photos from Nepal or India. They are really different! |
| Xavier |
Posted - 30/07/2018 : 10:26:22
quote:
It must be vitalisi here as they said.
Do you have more informations ? Do you have a picture of the holotype of E. vitalisi ? |
| longyun |
Posted - 29/07/2018 : 15:27:07
You mean he is wrong since cannot recognize hardwickii and vitalisi?
It must be vitalisi here as they said. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 19/02/2017 : 10:11:00
It seems that for MIROSHNIKOV A. I., 2014.A review of the genus Clytellus Westwood, 1853, with notes on its systematic position and descriptions of eleven new species; Figs.25 & 26 it is Epipedocera undulata (Hope)= Epipedocera hardwickii (White, 1855)
On picture, I do not see differences. |
| Larry Bezark |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 17:58:30
Thanks Tomas & Xavier,
Larry B. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 09:29:34
So, Epipedocera vitalisi Pic, 1922 for the valid name. |
| horshehden |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 02:28:03
It is E. vitalisi Pic. |
| Larry Bezark |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 21:16:22
Thanks, Xavier.
Larry B. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 20:49:19
There is a post about this species here
Unfortunately, we have not found the holotype of Epipedocera vitalisi Pic at MNHN. |
