T O P I C R E V I E W |
Xavier |
Posted - 13/08/2014 : 08:51:39 I open this subject about changes in Titan database ( my database reference) to discuss about their validity. Give me your opinion
Oplatocera Methiini Thomson, 1860 -> Xystrocerini Blanchard, 1845 |
4 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Xavier |
Posted - 13/08/2014 : 13:59:22 Ok, and thanks for compiling : I hadn't seen these topics |
Francesco |
Posted - 13/08/2014 : 13:48:36 Dear Xavier, concerning Xystrocerini-Oemini, we have already discussed in the following topics:
http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=14406 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=16192 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=16194 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=14791 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15218 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7876 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7047 http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1773
Evidently, who keeps using both names is too arrogant and/or ignorant and/or stupid to change idea.
|
horshehden |
Posted - 13/08/2014 : 09:56:36 Moreover, following Titan, Capnolymma (Acapnolymma) is inside Xylosteini, while Capnolymma in Dorcasomatini...
By contrast, Notorhabdium is in Lepturini, while other related genera in Xylosteini.
Thus, I have no idea how the authors create the tribal positions. |
horshehden |
Posted - 13/08/2014 : 09:18:50 And whatabout placing Afghanicenus into Clytini and Montrouzierina together with Blosyropus into Lepturini? |