| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 09/03/2015 : 09:45:53
Özdikmen & Turgut (2009: 302) put it as "Diorthus Gahan, 1891 is a synonym of Tapinolachnus Thomson, 1864"... but other references still have Diorthus as valid name... so which is the right one to maintain..
Kindly suggest |
| 7 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 12:45:07
Merci. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 12:13:07
On peut le décharger ici. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 11:45:45
J'ai besoin de savoir dans quel article de Özdikmen & Turgut (2009) cette combinaison a été écrite. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 11:08:39
quote:
Originally posted by Xavier
Note that Titan database only recognize the last publication (Özdikmen & Turgut, 2009: 302), and don't give a scientific position.
That is not true: note that Tavakilian, beside to publish never published synonymies and combinations, does not care all following publications, which only consider Diorthus:
WEIGEL, MENG & LIN, 2013 - Contribution to the Fauna of Longhorn Beetles in the Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve - Formosa Ecological Company, Taiwan: 1-219.
NGA & LONG, 2014 - A preliminary list of the subfamily Cerambycinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Vietnam - Tap Chi Sinh Hoc 36 (1): 12-38.
BHAWANE, GAIKWAD, GAIKWAD & MAMLAYYA, 2015 - Longicorn beetles and their diet breadth from forests of Kolhapur district, northern western Ghats, Maharashtra - The Bioscan 10 (2): 679-684.
MAJUMDER, HALDER, RAHA, MITRA & CHANDRA, 2016 - Longhorned Beetles from Gomarda Wildlife Sanctuary, Chhttisgarh, India (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) - Munis Entomology & Zoology 11 (2): 613-618. |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 09/03/2015 : 17:41:44
Thank you both for the right suggestion  ...
"Copy without understanding is very dangerous", a reality to be realized... |
| Francesco |
Posted - 09/03/2015 : 15:19:10
Unfortunately, Özdikmen & Turgut (2009) based this synonymy only on a wrong synonymy inserted in BioLib a lot of a time ago.
I eliminated it on 2.X.2008 since it did not have any supporting paper.
Nobody published the synonymy Diorthus = Tapinolachnus or combinations such as "Tapinolachnus cinereus (Fabricius, 1793)".
Actually, Özdikmen & Turgut did not publish this synonymy either but only quoted it.
It is very different!
Copy without understanding is very dangerous...
|
| Xavier |
Posted - 09/03/2015 : 13:13:34
Good question  .
In Titan database, the valid genus name is Tapinolachnus for all Diorthus sp. ... Note that Titan database only recognize the last publication (Özdikmen & Turgut, 2009: 302), and don't give a scientific position. |
|
|
