T O P I C R E V I E W |
dryobius |
Posted - 24/06/2019 : 19:56:48 TITAN date has the year of publication for LaPorte & Gory: Monographie du genre Clytus as 1841. Some workers attribute the publication year as 1836 or even 1835.
Has there been a paper published by Tavakilian or someone else which explained any of this? |
1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Jacek Kurzawa |
Posted - 24/09/2019 : 00:09:08 In Bosquet (2016) page 319:
quote: [1836–1837]. [Laporte, F.L.N. and Gory, H.] Monographie du genre Clytus. J.B. Baillières, Paris. 124 pp. + 20 pls. (8vo) (n.v.). This work was issued as livraisons 8–11 of Laporte and Gory’s “Histoire naturelle et iconographie des insectes Coléoptères, publiée par monographies séparées” as listed on page 6 of the first volume of the series. These livraisons were noticed as follows: 8: July–September 1836 (Soc Ent Fr [Annales, p. liv]), 24 October 1836 (Acad Sci Fr); 9: 24 October 1836 (Acad Sci Fr); 10: 21 December 1836 (Soc Ent Fr), 24 December 1836 (Bibl Fr), 20 February 1837 (Acad Sci Fr); 11: 15 February 1837 (Soc Ent Fr), 20 February 1837 (Acad Sci Fr). The content of each livraison is desired. This work is dated 1835 by Agassiz (1850: 200) and Hagen (1862: 450) but Sherborn (1922a: lxxviii) believed it was issued in 1836. A copy (titled “travail manuscrit”) was presented to the Académie des Sciences on 14 December 1835 (Anonymous 1835: 472) for which Duméril (1836) read a report at the academy meeting of 4 January 1836 for approval. The work was probably printed in 1835 but accessible to the public only during 1836. The monography was reissued under the title “Histoire naturelle et iconographie des insectes coléoptères, par H. Gory. Monographie des Clytus. Texte et planches, tome III” by P. Duménil, Paris, in 1841 [CNC, GB]. Due to an error by the printer, the name of Laporte was left out on the title page and so a second title page was issued later with the difference that “par H. Gory” was changed to “par H. Gory et F.-L. de La Porte, Comte de Castelnau.” In the first printing, the author order was Laporte and Gory.
"The work was probably printed in 1835 but accessible to the public only during 1836.". Anyway, year of publiacation of new taxons is rather 1836 not 1841.
I see 18 species listed as described in 1841: Chlorophorus amoenus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Chlorophorus capensis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Chlorophorus lituratus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Chlorophorus quinquefasciatus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Chlorophorus signaticollis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Chlorophorus sumatrensis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Demonax brahminus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Demonax elongatulus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Neoclytus carinatus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Mecometopus globicollis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Pirangoclytus triangularis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Plagionotulus senegalensis (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Rhaphuma wiedemanni (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Xylotrechus buqueti (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Xylotrechus carenifrons (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Xylotrechus javanicus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Xylotrechus ocellatus (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) Xylotrechus smei (Laporte de Castelnau & Gory, 1841) |
|
|