| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Francesco |
Posted - 27/01/2021 : 18:16:03
I have received the news that some taxonomic papers describing new species and published by Elsevier and Taylor & Francis were retracted since the authors failed to demonstrate Access and Benefit-Sharing with regard to the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre & Sabah Biodiversity Centre (1997) Cf. https://www.mabs.jp/countries/malaysia/index.html.
Some examples:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X20300789
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222933.2020.1851935
It seems that officials of Sabah and Sarawak are checking databases for papers published since 1997 up to now.
I do not known if the papers I published on materials purchased on eBay fit those obscure laws; nonetheless, it does result to me that the ICNZ allows to a country to use a local law (or an "international" law used for local Benefit-Sharing) for unilaterally retracting articles validly published by foreign scientists.
Maybe this is only possible for on-line papers. For printed papers should be science-fiction.
Your opinion? |
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Gerard |
Posted - 27/01/2021 : 20:56:46
La question est de savoir, ci ca c’est déjà produit et ci c’est valable.
Comment peut ont invalidé un article, ce qui est parus reste a toujours écrit non ?
|
| Xaurus |
Posted - 27/01/2021 : 19:03:28
sorry Francesco, I have post the same terrible things under the News-topic ! |
