All Forums  Generalities  Scientific questions  Retraction taxonomical papers

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize: 640 x 480 800 x 600 1024 x 768 1280 x 1024 UserName: Password: Format Mode: Basic  Help  Prompt  Format: Font Andale Mono Arial Arial Black Book Antiqua Century Gothic Comic Sans MS Courier New Georgia Impact Lucida Console Script MT Bold Stencil Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana   Size 1 2 3 4 5 6   Color Black Red Yellow Pink Green Orange Purple Blue Beige Brown Teal Navy Maroon LimeGreen Message: * HTML is OFF * Forum Code is ON Smilies [quote][i]Originally posted by Francesco[/i] [br]I have received the news that some taxonomic papers describing new species and published by Elsevier and Taylor & Francis were retracted since the authors failed to demonstrate Access and Benefit-Sharing with regard to the Sarawak Biodiversity Centre & Sabah Biodiversity Centre (1997) Cf. https://www.mabs.jp/countries/malaysia/index.html. Some examples: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287884X20300789 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222933.2020.1851935 It seems that officials of Sabah and Sarawak are checking databases for papers published since 1997 up to now. I do not known if the papers I published on materials purchased on eBay fit those obscure laws; nonetheless, it does result to me that the ICNZ allows to a country to use a local law (or an "international" law used for local Benefit-Sharing) for unilaterally retracting articles validly published by foreign scientists. Maybe this is only possible for on-line papers. For printed papers should be science-fiction. Your opinion? [/quote]    Insert an Image File Check here to include your profile signature.