Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lepturinae
 Lepturini
 Taiwan: Anoploderomorpha formosana

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Vitali Posted - 11/01/2012 : 09:13:17


To add to the topic of Anoploderomorpha.
The photo is not of a good quality, but maybe anyone can at least confirm that the beetle belongs to this genus.
It comes from Taiwan.
Three species were recorded from Taiwan: A. densepunctata Hayashi & Villiers, 1994, A. formosana (Matsushita, 1933) and A. izumii Mitono & Tamanuki, 1939.
I understand that identifying black Anoploderomorpha by photo is almost impossible, but maybe one can exclude any of the listed three species by some character, for example, by colour?
14   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Francesco Posted - 21/01/2012 : 07:35:52
As you noticed, the length/width ratio slightly depends on measuring angles... and Villiers measured only one specimen.
It would be interesting to know the real variability of that proportions.
Vitali Posted - 20/01/2012 : 23:15:26
Thank you a lot! Well, now having both descriptions on hand I find the description of A. formosana (too laconic though) fitting better my beetle.
The proportions of elytra still remain a puzzle, but other features seem correct.
Francesco Posted - 20/01/2012 : 22:03:09

According to me, your description and the locality fit well with Anoplodera formosana, whose original description can be read at the page 198 here.
At the left the holotype (a male according to Matsushita, but it seems to be a female).
Vitali Posted - 20/01/2012 : 21:41:01
Sorry for late reply, I was away from home.
Thank you for the description and comments.
I have a pair of these beetles. The male is slender and with a bit longer antennae. The puncture of pronotum is extremely dense, the intervals between points form thin ridges, which are slightly shiny. However, by no way I would call the whole pronotum shiny. Its appearance is rather obscure because of such a dense punctuation. Elytra are really shiny, their punctures are dense but not that much as in pronotum. Generally, regarding the density of punctures, the beetles could be regarded A. densepunctata. The length/width ratio of elytra is between 2.46 and 2.56, slightly depending on measuring angles. This also fits this species.
However, it comes from Puli, Nantou, that is from Northern Taiwan, which is not suitable for A. densepunctata.
Finally, what makes me doubt, is a strong depression in the basal part of elytra in both sexes, which is not mentioned in the description of A. densepunctata. Such a prominent feature cannot be overlooked. The depression is oblique from shoulders towards the centre behind scutellum. Because of it, a sharp flying-bird-like ridge is formed along the elytra base, curved around scutellum. It can be seen even in the bad photo I placed first.
So, what will be the decision? :-)
horshehden Posted - 18/01/2012 : 22:29:50
According to the Taiwanese book, A. densepunctata should be restricted to southernmost Taiwan.
What is the locality here?
Francesco Posted - 18/01/2012 : 22:25:05
mmmhm... the species was described on the basis of only one male (here we have a female), it is different in puncturing (not guessable here)... difficult!
Vitali Posted - 17/01/2012 : 15:17:42
Yes, thank you! I'll let you know the result later.
horshehden Posted - 17/01/2012 : 15:15:38

so may be now..
Vitali Posted - 17/01/2012 : 14:34:51
Probably the attachment name contained a space. I seem to have seen a corresponding warning placed once by Francesco.
horshehden Posted - 17/01/2012 : 14:20:41

...and attachement.
horshehden Posted - 17/01/2012 : 14:15:40
If this description will not correspond to your specimen, it will be A. formosana.
horshehden Posted - 11/01/2012 : 13:44:32
Insufficient is my time schedule:-)
will try to answer on Sun.
Vitali Posted - 11/01/2012 : 13:33:24
Thank you. If the photo is insufficient, could you please indicate some feature to distinguish between A. formosana and A. densepunctata?
horshehden Posted - 11/01/2012 : 10:32:58
A. (A) izumii is different by colour.
It looks more like A. (A) formosana than densepunctata, but I need my collection in hand to confirm it.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07