T O P I C R E V I E W |
Xavier |
Posted - 04/01/2013 : 17:22:20
15,5 mm. Hua Phan, nord Laos. Ever posted ? I don't refind it Could it be belongs to Uraecha genus? |
10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Francesco |
Posted - 01/11/2021 : 10:06:18 Possibly, it is sexual dimorphism. I am meeting a lot of Breuning's genera and species based on inconsistent or false characters... |
Xavier |
Posted - 01/11/2021 : 07:36:46 Holotype picture of Paruraecha sikkimensis is here. Picture is not good enough to compare, but my specimens do not fit with Breuning description.
I add another laotian specimen, with 4th antennomera longer than 3rd :
94.99 KB. Is it an undescribed species ? |
Xaurus |
Posted - 31/10/2021 : 23:08:52 I have a series of such spms from N-Vietnam with no satisfied identification results , but the genus should be Uraecha indeed. |
Francesco |
Posted - 31/10/2021 : 12:12:37 In Paruraecha, le 4e article est plus longue que le 3e. C'est n'est pas ce genre.
Est le mésosternum est arrondi ou tronqué? |
Xavier |
Posted - 23/09/2019 : 15:16:04 Paruraecha sikkimensis Breuning, 1938 |
Xavier |
Posted - 05/05/2019 : 08:18:10 320.27 KB 15 mm, nord Laos. Another specimen; it fits with none species of LIN M. & GE S.-Q., 2017. Notes on the genera Annamanum Pic and Uraecha Thomson. |
Xavier |
Posted - 03/03/2013 : 00:33:53 After seeing the type from MNHN-Paris, I don't believe my specimen belongs to U. angusta species ... Please, have a look here for helping me. |
Xavier |
Posted - 06/01/2013 : 15:41:54 Following the key (see at section's forum) , I arrive to U. angusta (Pascoe, 1865) |
Xavier |
Posted - 05/01/2013 : 00:54:53 Hi Vitali, Ok, I try to understand something |
Vitali |
Posted - 04/01/2013 : 22:30:54 Hello, Xavier. It looks like Uraecha indeed. The key from the review, which I mentioned in a previous ad is places here. You can try to identify your beetles with this (with the aid of Google translator, I guess). |