T O P I C R E V I E W |
BillTyson |
Posted - 17/03/2015 : 23:53:25 ![](/public/imgforum/BillTyson/2015317235252_vietnam38.JPG) 39.17 KB
N. Vietnam, Sapa Mt. 1450m Collected in April, 18mm |
7 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
jplami |
Posted - 21/03/2015 : 16:08:03 We see whitish part on more antennomera (but not visible on iii-iv). I have no better to suggest that Nanohammus or Nanohammus grangeri. |
BillTyson |
Posted - 21/03/2015 : 15:25:40 Two more pic showing antennae.
![](../public/imgforum/BillTyson/2015321152449_DSCN4239.JPG) 27.33 KB
![](../public/imgforum/BillTyson/2015321152510_DSCN4240.JPG) 26.6 KB |
jplami |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 22:54:37 On perçoit la pubescence sur l' article vi, peut-etre sur le v et on n'en voit pas les iii et iv. Ce serait bien d'avoir un cliche plus net sur ces articles antennaires.
we see whitish on antennomera vi, perhaps on v but i can t see on iii and iv. Is it possible to have another photo of this part. |
Xavier |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 21:19:19 Type specimen of Nanohammus grangeri Br. shows half basal part of antennomera 3 to 6 whitish, others whitish also, but less. Does it fit ? |
jplami |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 11:34:15 it seems to Nanohammus grangeri Breuning,1962 |
jplami |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 11:29:26 I think to Nanohammus female... |
nasa |
Posted - 18/03/2015 : 01:08:25 It should be put in section of Lamiinae. It is very like Similonedine brunniofasciata Hua, 1993.But the sides of prothorax a little different. |