| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Gerard |
Posted - 19/01/2021 : 23:28:13
199.08 KB
Vietnam, Tam Dao, Vinh Phuc, taille 20 mm |
| 8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 23/01/2021 : 14:27:35
294.74 KB
female and male from N-Vietnam, my male fits very well with the HT of B. puae !
The underside of the male is the same like in Gerard's male and the female has large black spots at the abdominal sides, and the basal parts of the antennal joints are white, does it belong to B. undulatus or multinotatus? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 22/01/2021 : 06:33:32
Blepephaeus puae Lin, 2011 has a full black band before the apex, so I do not know if it is the good identification. |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 22/01/2021 : 01:51:27
yes, P. undulatus: http://159.226.67.77/topic_detail.aspx?id=470
seem to be a good choice !
|
| Gerard |
Posted - 21/01/2021 : 22:41:23
Pour moi ca correspond bien au type Perihammus undulatus Pu, 1999 non ? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 21/01/2021 : 13:30:40
Good question, I am not sure they are different species.
Ht picture of Blepephaeus puae Lin, 2011 has a full last black band.
Anyway, Gerard specimen should not be B.mausoni which has dark brown antenna  . |
| MONO |
Posted - 21/01/2021 : 13:12:41
quote:
Originally posted by Xavier
Blepephaeus mausoni (Breuning, 1947)
what is the difference between Blepephaeus puae and Blepephaeus mausoni? |
| Gerard |
Posted - 20/01/2021 : 18:01:01
Merci Xav  |
| Xavier |
Posted - 20/01/2021 : 07:24:40
Blepephaeus mausoni (Breuning, 1947) |
