T O P I C R E V I E W |
Capitaine |
Posted - 28/04/2015 : 17:00:44 171.13 KB
And for this other one with hairy third antennal segment, (Yunnan) 20 mm |
8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Francesco |
Posted - 12/01/2021 : 19:27:25 ICZN Art. 23.9.5. When an author discovers that a species-group name in use is a junior primary homonym [Art. 53.3] of another species-group name also in use, but the names apply to taxa not considered congeneric after 1899, the author must not automatically replace the junior homonym; the case should be referred to the Commission for a ruling under the plenary power and meanwhile prevailing usage of both names is to be maintained.
Ca reste testacea.
|
Xavier |
Posted - 12/01/2021 : 18:03:37 Saperda testacea Saunders, 1839 étant préoccupé, le nom valide de cette espece est Linda (Dasylinda) scopigera (Thomson, 1868) in LIN M. & TAVAKILIAN G., 2019. Chrysomeloidea Cerambycidae Lamiinae. In Lin Meiting & Yang Xingke editors, Science Press (Beijing). Catalogue of Chinese Coleoptera 9: i-xxii + 1-575 |
Capitaine |
Posted - 12/12/2015 : 15:50:47 Merci Francesco, j'en était resté à Dasylinda sp...'' |
Francesco |
Posted - 12/12/2015 : 13:18:44 Il s'agit de Linda (Dasylinda) testacea (Saunders, 1839).
Même espèce ici dans la gallery. |
Capitaine |
Posted - 29/04/2015 : 10:55:22 On reste dans la même famille! merci Xavier. |
Xavier |
Posted - 28/04/2015 : 19:09:52 If this ID, here, is right, your species could belong to subgenus Dasylinda. |
Capitaine |
Posted - 28/04/2015 : 18:19:45 Thank you Xavier, I still have a doubt as on this article http://www.hindawi.com/journals/psyche/2012/672684/ All representations of Linda sp. don't feature such hairs on the third antenae segment ... |
Xavier |
Posted - 28/04/2015 : 17:32:09 It should belong to Linda genus. |