| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Vitali |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 00:46:22
392.81 KB
A confusing couple: the colour pattern seems almost identical; the male is without a hair tuft in fourth antenna segment; the female has it.
Size: male 13 mm, female 18 mm. |
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Vitali |
Posted - 27/06/2017 : 20:18:58
Oops! I missed the latest ads.
Thank you for the identification. |
| Gerard |
Posted - 20/02/2017 : 07:54:30
Bien vue Ivan 
190.29 KB
Cacia (Ipocregyes) lepesmei Gressitt, 1951 |
| MONO |
Posted - 20/02/2017 : 05:47:02
I think it is Cacia lepesmei (Gressitt, 1951) in China
|
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 10:10:03
to apologize :
Original description of Falsoereis cephalotes Pic, 1925 = Cacia (Ipocregyes) cephalotes (Pic, 1925)in Titan database. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:47:01
but I make a mistake ! Confusion between Cacia cephalotes Pic and Cacia cephaloides Breu.  .
So, I say ...nothing ! (sorry for that) |
| jplami |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:40:23
Most precisely, Cacia (Ipocregyes) sp. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:37:54
I do not say it is not a Cacia, but it is not C. cephalotes Breu. which has a different pattern. |
| jplami |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:36:17
Sorry Xavier, I prepared my response. I didn't see your remark.
So, the determination of mine is also false. |
| jplami |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:33:14
I'm ok with Andreas. I have in collection, one female determinated Cacia (Ipocregyes) cephalotes (Pic, 1925).
It has hair tuft on 4th antenna segment like the right one and same elytral pattern than the left one. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 09:21:46
It is not Cacia cephalotes Pic
|
| Xaurus |
Posted - 05/04/2015 : 02:16:09
maybe Cacia cephalotes (Pic, 1925) or nearby, not sure before checking the type spm. |
