| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 08:39:55
Hi, I just need confirmation of Callimetopus danilevskyi?
The specimen is rather damaged unfortunately.
Data: 05-2014 - Dupax del sur - Nueva viscaya - Philippines - 13.5mm
213.91 KB |
| 10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Francesco |
Posted - 10/02/2016 : 13:00:11
Yes, it is good.  |
| Vitali |
Posted - 10/02/2016 : 11:43:20
The apical spine of pronotum is not observed at all in of C. danilevskyi.
A nice find with elytral apex. Maybe the most reliable feature.
So, different species? |
| Francesco |
Posted - 10/02/2016 : 10:28:46
368.09 KB
Looking for differences...
I also find a different elytral apex.
The antennomere IV is white in albatus.
However, the apical spine of the pronotum seems to be variable in albatus. |
| Vitali |
Posted - 10/02/2016 : 09:50:02
Yes, the latter is C. albatus.
Pay attention to the differences in the apical part of a white pattern in elytra and to the side teeth in the apical part of pronotum.
Other thing if these differences justify different species. |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 10/02/2016 : 08:34:02
I agree, they look near identical at times.
Here is a Callimetopus albatus from my collection.
290.1 KB |
| Francesco |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 22:32:53
The problem is Callimetopus albatus (Newman, 1842), described from Luzon as well, and completely overlooked in the description.
Here, there is the type. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 16:28:01
I wonder if Gérard has not seen a similar species described by Breuning (1980) at MNHN ?? I will ask him. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 16:12:20
I doubt that danilevskyi is a valid species... |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 12:52:20
Thank you, name corrected. |
| Vitali |
Posted - 09/02/2016 : 09:43:55
Yes, it is.
A small correction to the geographic name:
Dupax del Sur, Nueva Vizcaya |
