| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Xavier |
Posted - 07/12/2016 : 09:07:36
304.39 KB
6mm, Sierra Madre, Aurora, E. Luzon, Philippines.
It fits with the description of Cylindroplocia pseudobityle Heller, 1924.
Then, which name is correct ? 
Cylindroplocia pseudobityle Heller, 1924 ?
Sybra pseudobityle (Heller, 1924) ?
Sybra (Cylindroplocia) pseudobityle (Heller, 1924) ?
Mycerinopsis pseudobityle (Heller, 1924) ? |
| 7 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 11/12/2016 : 09:17:22
Ok, thank you. I change the label  |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 10/12/2016 : 23:54:44
In our first paper on Sybra we reinstalled the genus Bityle as a valid genus, indeed we gave only a remark that the genus Cylindroplocia probably is syn. of Bityle, in the next paper we'll make the new comb. for the acc sps. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 10/12/2016 : 11:51:49
quote:
Originally posted by Xaurus
Bityle pseudobityle (Heller, 1925)
What is this name ? |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 10/12/2016 : 00:11:11
Bityle pseudobityle (Heller, 1925)
Have anybody more material from this genus, it seems that this sps are rare in collections ? |
| Andre |
Posted - 09/12/2016 : 15:05:39
We will try to solve this problem in our next Apomecynini publication (in work).
Specimens would be very welcome  |
| Xavier |
Posted - 07/12/2016 : 14:18:20
Merci |
| Francesco |
Posted - 07/12/2016 : 11:43:13
La réponse est ici.
En résumant: le dernier nom valide est Sybra (Cylindroplocia) pseudobityle, mais probablement le sous-genre Cylindroplocia est synonyme de Bytile (chose encore ŕ vérifier et publier). |
