T O P I C R E V I E W |
Vitali |
Posted - 11/02/2017 : 00:16:13 327.61 KB
Looks like Mispila. But with such antennae!? North Luzon. 4.2 mm. |
7 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Xavier |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 14:37:16 Well, may be I am not so stupid. But the problem remains the same: no way on picture. May be it is possible to loan holotypes specimens, to check how many synonyms have been described by Fisher ? |
Vitali |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 13:55:40 I agree. Fisher (1925) described 4 similar species from 4 different islands (E. pilosicornis, E. hirsuta, E. basalis and E. albopicta) each from 1 specimen, male or female. The descriptions are given in a copy-paste mode and I really cannot see the difference except lighter colour in E. pilosicornis, which may refer to a somewhat immature specimen.
My 5th specimen comes from a 5th island, and it is almost impossible to make a decision on its name, considering that also Fisher was in doubt about his descriptions himself. This is what he has written about E. hirsuta:
50.18 KB |
Xavier |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 08:19:33 quote: Originally posted by Xaurus
similar creatures are described also in Athylia or Enispia, in most cases to read descriptions for such deficile species is less successfull
so, no way. |
Xaurus |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 00:44:59 similar creatures are described also in Athylia or Enispia, in most cases to read descriptions for such deficile species is less successfull |
Xavier |
Posted - 11/02/2017 : 09:48:53 Comparing to holotype pictures on Smithsonian website, it is sure an Ebaeides sp. 8 species in Philippines, but the probleme is that 4 or 5 species are quite similar on picture... so, you have to read one by one descriptions. |
Vitali |
Posted - 11/02/2017 : 09:21:13 Thank you. You are obviously right. Mesotibia seemed to me strongly bent, but this can be a furrow. In that case this is not Pteropliini. |
Xaurus |
Posted - 11/02/2017 : 00:28:52 this nice sps belongs probably to the genus Ebaeides Thomson, 1864 (Apomecynini) but in such similar genera there is a big confusion. |