T O P I C R E V I E W |
Xaurus |
Posted - 27/04/2023 : 00:14:48 372.92 KB
male from SE-Vietnam, Gia Lai Prov, Kon Ka Kinh NP, about 40 mm |
8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Xaurus |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 19:16:29 great, thanks I agree with A. george |
sebastes |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 11:06:53 Aegosoma george Do, 2015. Mt. Bato, 850 m, Quang Ngai prov., C. Vietnam, male 51 mm.
330.32 KB |
Xavier |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 08:24:31 Ok, this last specimen is closer to my specimens of Aegosoma george Do, 2015 from Laos.Thank you Sebastes for this good picture of A. kusamai. |
Xaurus |
Posted - 29/04/2023 : 00:08:54 another male from the same location, with shorter antennae esp. the 5th segment, really probably the same species, so sebastes are right with his comment
269.41 KB |
sebastes |
Posted - 28/04/2023 : 15:49:38 Agree wuth Greg. Not A. kusamai exactly. In my experience, antenna length varies even within the same population of the same species. Therefore, it cannot be the main defining feature. Below is a true A. kusamai from N. Thailand.
412.74 KB |
Xavier |
Posted - 28/04/2023 : 13:51:57 quote: Originally posted by Greg
Aegosoma george Do. 2015 I would say.
No, the length of the antennae does not fit this species. |
Greg |
Posted - 27/04/2023 : 21:20:27 Aegosoma george Do. 2015 I would say. |
Xavier |
Posted - 27/04/2023 : 07:44:41 Close to Aegosoma kusamai (Komiya, 1999), but probably something else. |