| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 14:17:56
20.38 KB
Dorysthenes huegelii
INDIA, Karnataka |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 28/01/2015 : 19:07:30
Thank you for the confirmation... |
| Francesco |
Posted - 28/01/2015 : 14:51:11
quote:
Originally posted by sangamesh
the III antenommere reach the second pronotal spine, and antennae is toothed/ angulated apically from 4 th antenommere...3 rd is not angulated...
None of these characters belong to D. huegellii.
It should be Dorysthenes buqueti (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 28/01/2015 : 11:59:03
sir, the III antenommere reach the second pronotal spine, and antennae is toothed/ angulated apically from 4 th antenommere...3 rd is not angulated... |
| Francesco |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 20:58:34
Here you can find a picture of two reliable D. huegelii.
They are difficult beetles and a good preparation helps a lot.
We have to know how long the antenommere III is (does it reach the first, the second pronotal tooth or the basis?). Are the antennae tooth from the article 3, 4, 5 or 6?
Here, I do not understand. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 20:56:15
Sorry, what do you mean? |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 18:57:52
have i mistaken from this http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/Dorysthenes-Vigors-1826-%28genus%29 |
| Xavier |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 18:25:40
I have one specimen of D. huegelii from northern India and teeth of pronotum are longer. |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 17:47:32
153.21 KB
Sir, is this ok? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 26/01/2015 : 17:23:35
Dear Sangamesh, have you got a better picture of the pronotum ? |
