| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 01:06:21
49) |
| 8 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Francesco |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 19:31:25
If the eyes are really hairless (use microscope!), the first is A. tibetanus. |
| Francesco |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 19:23:34
Yes: the specimens with an only central depression on the pronotum belong to Cephalallus.
Red specimens of C. oberthueri belong to the variety unicolor (Gahan, 1906). |
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 17:47:35
the 3rd sp. also 2000m+ but is different valley.
so they are 3 specimens from 3 different localities.
|
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 17:19:56
the second one sp50 is probably not Cephalallus oberthueri, which was be found in N.India & Myanmar.
the leg's color is different. One is black another is red. |
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 17:14:25
the comparison.
left is sp 49 (2000m), right one is the second one sp 50 (1000m)
Grazie! |
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 17:12:59
another one,sp50, this is a low elevation species, 1000 m.
the sp49 is over 2000m
probably is different two species? |
| timoinsects |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 17:11:01
it is hairless.
|
| Francesco |
Posted - 17/10/2012 : 12:04:44
Surely, Arhopalus .
It might be A. deceptor (Sharp, 1905) or A. tibetanus (Sharp, 1905), both described from Tibet.
Are the eyes pubescent or hairless? |
