| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| dryobius |
Posted - 20/02/2015 : 02:19:01
178 KB
A specimen of Paraleprodera ?
in a friend's collection. The basal gibbosities are deformed on this specimen. |
| 12 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 25/11/2016 : 08:54:25
Thank you. |
| horshehden |
Posted - 30/07/2016 : 18:04:59
Pseudoechthistatus holzschuhi Bi et Lin, 2016 |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 18/10/2015 : 21:28:51
So still Pseudoechthistatus obliquefasciatus? Going on those keys.. |
| Gerard |
Posted - 18/10/2015 : 20:10:15
Bonjour j'ai aussi un couple de cette espèce.
Voici la description de Pic.
82.66 KB |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 01/10/2015 : 00:30:57
in fact this sps are not wingless, and I believe the 3 pictured spms belong to Pseudechthistatus birmanicus. |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 29/09/2015 : 01:01:01
Yes, P. obliquefasciatus is an other sps, however P. birmanicus is very near but with relatively large smooth granules at the elytral surface, probably we have a new sps from Sa Pa area. |
| horshehden |
Posted - 28/09/2015 : 14:03:24
This is not P. obliquefasciatus for sure.
|
| horshehden |
Posted - 25/02/2015 : 11:48:46
But your female is from the same locality as the specimen on top, right? (Sapa, Vietnam)
Dali area (type locality of P. obliquefasciatus) is relatively subtropic, but if the species is wingless I do not beleive that same species is distributed in Sapa area. |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 21/02/2015 : 01:10:11
I can confirm for the time, but P. birmanicus Breuning, 1942 is very simliar, and there are for sure more undescribed sps., I think this sps are wingless, or ? |
| Sergi |
Posted - 20/02/2015 : 12:41:03
I think also that Pseudoechthistatus obliquefasciatus is right. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 20/02/2015 : 09:23:05
Paraleprodera was my idea, but I was wrong  |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 20/02/2015 : 08:22:42
Hi there.
Try Pseudoechthistatus obliquefasciatus.
This is a Female in my collection
246.15 KB
Regards
Ben |
