| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 03/08/2016 : 09:12:31
98.42 KB
Kerala.. Apomecynini? |
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 25/02/2019 : 05:44:57
Thank you |
| Francesco |
Posted - 24/02/2019 : 14:18:38
Many compliments Sangamesh!  |
| Xavier |
Posted - 24/02/2019 : 11:01:19
Thanks Sangamesh, and many congratulations for this work ! |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 24/02/2019 : 10:28:38
It is now officially known as Miccolamia ferruginea sp. nov...
Thank you everyone for the great support.
The article can be accessed here |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 25/11/2016 : 15:14:58
Thank you very much for the help... |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 24/11/2016 : 23:47:55
yes Miccolamia is the right genus for your sps and close to M. savioi Gressitt, 1940, furthermore I can exclude the species described by Holzschuh 2003, 2010 and Pesarini & Sabbadini, 1996 all are different.
Probably your sps is new for science |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 03/09/2016 : 20:13:31
can this be Miccolamia?... |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 07/08/2016 : 23:44:30
this paper I don't know, please Dan you can send me a pdf - thanks,
I have 2 spms from Poring und Mahua, but I'm not sure both are L. bicolor !
|
| dryobius |
Posted - 05/08/2016 : 15:06:42
nomenclature change
Matsuo, S. & J. Yamasako. 2011. A new replacememt name, Languriomiccolamia, nom. nov. for Languriomorpha Fisher, 1925 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Desmiphorini). Jap. J. Sys Ent. 17 (1): 67-68.
I have never seen this genus from Borneo.
Languriomiccolamia is still apparently known from only the holotype from Sandakan, Sabah. |
| sangamesh |
Posted - 05/08/2016 : 07:04:26
the specimen looks similar in habitus to Languriomorpha but has many differences, apparently seen are: the eyes are not divided; antennae is not pedunculate rather it is bulbous... actually elytral base does not have spines but it is bulged a bit (like a ridge)... |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 03/08/2016 : 23:40:56
maybe Languriomorpha Fisher (Desmiphorini), I see spines at the elytral base in your spm, maybe a sexual dimorphism, see also:
http://smithsoniancerambycidae.com/default.asp?Action=Show_Types&Single_Type=True&TypeID=900 |
