Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
nalslan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
297 Posts |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 13:52:55
|
![](/public/imgforum/nalslan/2013129134758_s2-s.jpg)
Another one also from Guizhou, China. Bi has said that it could be a Uraecha on his first sight. I found it has a mesosternal process which a Uraecha should not have. So I got lost. Any idea? Thanks. |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9412 Posts |
Posted - 29/01/2013 : 19:32:52
|
I am not sure that this beetle belongs to Lamiini. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Max
Member Rosalia
![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif)
Russia
713 Posts |
Posted - 31/01/2013 : 17:43:43
|
I have a discreet idea - Annamanum sp. ![](images/icon_smile_shy.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
nalslan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
297 Posts |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9412 Posts |
Posted - 07/03/2013 : 20:05:39
|
It should be Annamanum chebanum (Gahan, 1895)... originally described as Uraecha.![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1896 Posts |
Posted - 07/03/2013 : 22:34:06
|
this spms looks like Annamanum lunulatum (Pic) but with really big black spots, in Annamanum the mesosternal processus should be enhanced and vertical declined anteriorely vice in Uraecha.
bG Andreas |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
nalslan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
297 Posts |
Posted - 08/03/2013 : 15:50:02
|
Many thanks to Francesco again and Andreas. I noticed that my beetle is alike Annamanum lunulatum (Thanks to Xavier, Bi and others on the forum for posting relative materials and photos) but I could not conclude that they are the same species. I went to check Annamanum chebanum today and found the original description, and found how it said about the patch on elytra:
quote:
"...each with a somewhat roughly triangular velvety brown patch at the side just behind the middle ; this patch bounded in front and behind by an oblique dirty white patch which appears to be almost impunctate..."
So it raised my concern on the shape of the patch. I don't know how to get access to type photos from The Natural History Museum of London for the A. chebanum. Fortunately, I found a picture (fig. 2 f) of A. chebanum in Ponpinji (2011)'s checklist of Lamiinae in North Thailand (www.cerambycoidea.com/titles/ponpinij2011.pdf). I think my beetle is slightly different from A. lunulatum. I'll keep looking for others in the genus.
Thanks again to all of you!
![](../public/imgforum/nalslan/201338154926_A.chebanum.jpg) 73.94#160;KB |
Edited by - nalslan on 08/03/2013 16:01:02 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9412 Posts |
Posted - 08/03/2013 : 18:10:16
|
I have tried to improve your picture that is fairly clear on my PC; this is the result:
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/201338175843_2013129134758_s2-s.jpg)
This species has nothing to do with Annamanum lunulatum, which is grey with a black spot. Here:
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/2013214163120_Ann8458.jpg)
The image of Ponpinji's paper seems to be wrong; it should be Annamanum rondoni Br. Here the type:
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/20133818528_DSCN4449.JPG)
On the contrary, this is the pattern of A. chebanum (Breuning, 1944):
![](../public/imgforum/Francesco/20133818857_DSCN4450.JPG) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
nalslan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
297 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 02:30:06
|
Thank you Francesco! That makes things clear! Though I am still hesitating a little bit on the ratio of the patch position at the elytra. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1896 Posts |
Posted - 31/01/2018 : 15:08:02
|
this species is now described as Annamanum magnum Holzschuh, 2017
|
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
nalslan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
China
297 Posts |
Posted - 01/02/2018 : 03:29:23
|
Nice. Can you post source detail? Or even better, a copy of pdf? Thank you! |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|