Author |
Topic |
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 17/03/2013 : 12:44:26
|
Here a specimen from China, Xizang Chayu, Zhuowagong, 2500 m (Thank you, BI ) |
Edited by - Xavier on 15/05/2018 18:34:53 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 24/09/2015 : 17:00:27
|
...des épines à peine distinctes, c'est un Demonax proche de Demonax tryznai Viktora, 2015 nouvellement décrit du nord-est de l'Inde |
|
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1924 Posts |
Posted - 24/09/2015 : 23:36:14
|
For me R. aranea Holzschuh, 1984 or R. nishidai Hayashi & Makihara, 1981 ! |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 07:23:02
|
Thanks, I check both. |
|
|
BinLiu
Member Demonax
China
97 Posts |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 16:42:55
|
Hi Xavier, the locality is misspell, it should be Zhuwagen (ÖñÍ߸ù), is a township of Chayu area. |
love longicorns |
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 25/09/2015 : 19:01:53
|
quote: Originally posted by Xavier
Thanks, I check both.
I also have some specimens from Northwest Yunnan. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 28/09/2015 : 17:37:47
|
quote: Originally posted by BinLiu
Hi,Xavier,the locality is misspell,it should be Zhuwagen(ÖñÍ߸ù),is a township of Chayu area.
Thanks my friend |
|
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 28/09/2015 : 19:06:55
|
Rather R. nishidai? At least, I have determined my specimen from the same area as such. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 12/10/2015 : 11:22:03
|
quote: Originally posted by horshehden
Rather R. nishidai? At least, I have determined my specimen from the same area as such.
In the description text, Rhaphuma nishidai Hayashi & Makihara, 1981 has black pronotum and " antenna short", "antenna shorter than the body", etc, so I do not think it is this species. |
|
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 12/10/2015 : 22:58:17
|
Where do you see it? |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 13/10/2015 : 17:03:36
|
According to the paper, black is thorax, ie body. Not pronotum, which has the same colour as elytra. |
|
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1924 Posts |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 01:22:07
|
for me this is R. nishidai too, I think only the females have a spine at the underside of the 3rd antennal segment --> again the known problem within the genera Rhaphuma and Demonax, also Demonax tryznai Viktora, 2015 is very similar, only a bit darker, why this sps isn't compared with R. nishidai and R. aranea by Viktora (2015) |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 09:27:20
|
Really, I do not know. I see some differences with the description of Rhaphuma nishidai : no suberect hairs on the pronotum or neither elytra, only the half basal part of the thorax brownish-black, and short spines on 4th antennomera ( so, it should be a Demonax sp. ?? ). Legs color is uniform, no darker or lighter in parts as said in description.
|
Edited by - Xavier on 14/10/2015 09:47:31 |
|
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 18:29:35
|
It is in your hand, so you should know more:) |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12219 Posts |
Posted - 14/10/2015 : 19:29:39
|
Thanks all guys for your help |
Edited by - Xavier on 14/10/2015 19:29:53 |
|
|
Topic |
|