| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
dpotanin
Member Purpuricenus
Russia
186 Posts |
 Posted - 21/11/2013 : 23:10:33
|
174.33 KB
Cameron Highlands, Malaysia
?Clytus sp. |
Edited by - Xavier on 22/09/2016 15:05:43 |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12124 Posts |
Posted - 31/01/2016 : 16:21:42
|
103.64 KB
I feel it is a Rhaphuma sp., but I do not find it. |
Edited by - Xavier on 20/09/2016 13:36:08 |
 |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12124 Posts |
Posted - 20/09/2016 : 13:46:17
|
| Something beetween Rhaphuma connexa Aurivillius, 1922 (Indonesia) and Rhaphuma campanulifera Aurivillius, 1922 Philippines (Luzon) |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
552 Posts |
Posted - 20/09/2016 : 22:21:39
|
| Rhaphuma brevivittata (Aurivillius, 1922) |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12124 Posts |
Posted - 21/09/2016 : 08:17:42
|
24.2 KB
Rhaphuma brevivittata (Aurivillius, 1922)
The original drawing, and picture from Viktora (2014) do not show 2nd and 3rd band connected. A variation ? I do not know. |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
552 Posts |
Posted - 22/09/2016 : 02:02:45
|
My comparison was not enough.
Now, I think Denis's specimen is not R. brevivittata.
This image is my R. brevivittata.
89.92 KB |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12124 Posts |
Posted - 22/09/2016 : 15:04:54
|
Ok with you.
This species could be a new one. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12124 Posts |
Posted - 12/02/2017 : 15:41:34
|
140.7 KB
I talked about Rhaphuma campanulifera Aurivillius, 1922; here 2 specimens from Philippines.
Do you have a picture of your specimen prepared ?
The main difference is the second transversal band. It can't be R. campanulifera ( Philippines are too far away), and I still believe it could be a new species. |
Edited by - Xavier on 12/02/2017 15:46:37 |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Malaysia: Rhaphuma sp.
