Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Cerambycinae
 Callichromatini
 China, Chloridolum: (Leontium) robusticolle
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

nasa
Member Rosalia

China
960 Posts

Posted - 17/11/2014 :  08:26:15  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote

233.69 KB


205.8 KB


109.28 KB

Chloridolum from Yunnan, SW China.
Thanks

Edited by - Capitaine on 30/01/2016 17:16:42

Andre
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1692 Posts

Posted - 21/11/2014 :  17:30:25  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
It's Chelidonium herteli Podany, 1974
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9420 Posts

Posted - 07/02/2019 :  19:17:14  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
According to Bentanachs & Jiroux (2019), Chloridolum (Leontium) robusticolle (Pic, 1946) = Chelidonium herteli Podaný, 1974
Go to Top of Page

Andre
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1692 Posts

Posted - 20/02/2019 :  11:52:00  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Die Synonymie halte ich durchaus für gerechtfertigt, doch leider wurde auf die Untersuchung der genitalmorphologie verzichtet.
Eine Synonymie innerhalb der Gattung Chloridolum halte ich nur nach Bild für sehr gewagt und bringt eigentlich nur neue Unklarheiten. Aber vielleicht wurde ja auch weiteres Material untersucht und nicht in der Arbeit aufgeführt !

Weitere, extrem ähnliche Arten, und nach meiner Meinung nicht sicher durch äußere Morphologie zu trennen sind:

Chloridolum cyaneonotatum Pic, 1925, chapaense Pic, 1932, hainanicum Gressitt, 1940, shibatai Hayashi, 1971 und Chloridolum nadleri, Skale, 2018.
Dazu kommen bisher unidentifizierte Arten, welche all diesen Arten sehr ähnlich sind.
Wenn es jetzt ein Merkmal gibt, welches zumindest im männlichen Geschlecht in den meisten Fällen alle Unklarheiten beseitigen kann..... so kann ich nicht verstehen, warum man das dann auch nicht nutzt
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12070 Posts

Posted - 20/02/2019 :  12:15:33  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Translation in English of Andre answer above :
I consider the synonymy to be justified, but unfortunately the examination of the genital morphology has been omitted.
I consider a synonymy within the genus Chloridolum to be very hazardous only after pictures and actually, it brings only new ambiguities. But maybe more material was examined and not listed in the paper!

Other extremely similar species and, in my opinion, not surely separable by external morphology are:

Chloridolum cyaneonotatum Pic, 1925, chapaense Pic, 1932, hainanicum Gressitt, 1940, shibatai Hayashi, 1971 and Chloridolum nadleri, scale, 2018.
Until today still unidentified species, which are very similar to all these species, should be added to them.
If there is now a character, which in most cases can eliminate all ambiguities at least in the male..... so I cannot understand why it is not used either

Edited by - Xavier on 20/02/2019 12:16:32
Go to Top of Page

Andre
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1692 Posts

Posted - 20/02/2019 :  12:18:17  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Thank you Xavier
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07