|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9420 Posts |
 Posted - 03/03/2015 : 18:36:47
|
Reading Titan Base, Grammographus was possibly revalided by Ohbayashi (1960) on the basis of Japanese materials; thus, incorrectly.
With respect to Demonax, this taxon shows shorter antennal spines... an evident risible character for everyone has at least 2 different species of Demonax in his own collection.
The only thing to write is to transfer Grammographus submaculatus Hayashi, 1974 and G. taiwanensis Hayashi, 1966 (the only two species never considered as a Demonax) to the genus Demonax. Maybe the next paper on this genus?  |
 |
|
China, Demonax notabilis cuneatus?
