| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
BillTyson
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1200 Posts |
 Posted - 20/03/2015 : 01:12:32
|
18.35 KB
From N. Vietnam, Bac Me, June, 15mm Hope these new pics will help.
39.69 KB
25.98 KB |
Edited by - Xavier on 22/03/2015 17:52:47 |
|
|
jplami
Member Rosalia
France
656 Posts |
|
|
BillTyson
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1200 Posts |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 15:11:37
|
I try for a better picture.
The elytral markings are in bands, not marks and are grey. The antennae are dark. |
 |
|
|
Bennyboymothman
Member Rosenbergia
United Kingdom
1640 Posts |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 19:21:45
|
| Similar to Blepephaeus multinotatus? |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 21:13:24
|
| Not easy with your picture, but I am agree with Ben : possibly, Blepephaeus multinotatus (Pic, 1925) |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 17:52:16
|
| On pictures you added, I don't recognize B. multinotatus. |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 22:27:36
|
| Is the prosternum between the procoxae lower (as most Cerambycids) or as high as the coxae? |
|
|
|
Bennyboymothman
Member Rosenbergia
United Kingdom
1640 Posts |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 23:56:40
|
| Me neither, not Blepephaeus multinotatus now.... |
|
|
|
BillTyson
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1200 Posts |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 02:56:46
|
| very low, not even half the way up the coxae. |
|
|
|
Vitali
Member Rosalia
Estonia
994 Posts |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 09:00:31
|
Seems to be Blepephaeus infelix (Pascoe, 1856).
It was discussed at the Forum earlier as well. |
|
|
|
jplami
Member Rosalia
France
656 Posts |
|
|
BillTyson
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1200 Posts |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 19:47:22
|
| Thanks everyone. Sorry to create so many questions and problems. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Vietnam: Blepephaeus infelix
