Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1907 Posts |
Posted - 08/04/2015 : 01:05:15
|
![](/public/imgforum/Xaurus/2015481429_stenodryas spec.jpg) 273 KB
maybe Stenodryas bicoloripes (Pic, 1922) compared with the HT in the type section (N-Vietnam, Pia Oac, female, 12mm), hind femur different |
Edited by - Xavier on 08/04/2015 07:40:27 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 08/04/2015 : 07:40:08
|
Why not Stenodryas inapicalis (Pic, 1922)? available in the same type section. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1907 Posts |
Posted - 09/04/2015 : 00:23:37
|
Yes, you are right Xavier, S. inapicalis is better, only the pronotum is a bit different, thanks. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
|
|