| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
 Posted - 23/07/2015 : 10:10:46
|
99.98 KB
Captured in the wood from Nigeria.
Do you have the ID?
Thanks! |
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 23/07/2015 : 11:41:24
|
It seems to be Freadelpha (s. str.) eremita (Westwood, 1845).
Cf. here. |
 |
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 23/07/2015 : 16:02:21
|
Thanks, Francesco!  |
|
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 24/07/2015 : 06:44:38
|
| Does it exist variation in body color? |
|
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 26/07/2015 : 17:02:11
|
106.94 KB
Here is the picture by Westwood (1844) |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 26/07/2015 : 18:35:23
|
That by Westwood is the typical form, yours should be the ssp. gabonensis Breuning.
Here both subspecies from Allard's book.
Freadelpha eremita eremita & F. eremita gabonenis in Allard, 1993 |
|
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 26/07/2015 : 19:34:30
|
I feel confused! What about the holotype of Freadelpha eremita gabonensis Breuning, 1954?
Is Larry's database wrong? |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9454 Posts |
Posted - 27/07/2015 : 22:57:41
|
This is certanly not the holotype of gabonensis but Thomson's drawing of a specimen from Gabon! Cf. here.
I have not Breuning's original description, but according to Allard, gabonensis is characterised by whitish, rather that coloured, pubescence.
It seems to me that populations are actually mixed; thus, I doubt about the validity of this subspecies. |
|
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 28/07/2015 : 03:42:07
|
Thanks! I also agree with you.
I can not see distinct differences of both species based on the pictures of Allard except the color. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Nigeria: Freadelpha (s. str.) eremita
