Author |
Topic |
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
USA
2238 Posts |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 20:00:05
|
104.74 KB
Xaignabouri, Laos Looks similar to Epipedocera subundulata Gressitt & Rondon 1970 but without the subapical band. |
Edited by - Xavier on 19/02/2017 10:17:49 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 20:49:19
|
There is a post about this species here Unfortunately, we have not found the holotype of Epipedocera vitalisi Pic at MNHN. |
Edited by - Xavier on 03/04/2016 20:51:08 |
|
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
USA
2238 Posts |
Posted - 03/04/2016 : 21:16:22
|
Thanks, Xavier.
Larry B. |
|
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 02:28:03
|
It is E. vitalisi Pic. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 09:29:34
|
So, Epipedocera vitalisi Pic, 1922 for the valid name. |
|
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
USA
2238 Posts |
Posted - 04/04/2016 : 17:58:30
|
Thanks Tomas & Xavier,
Larry B. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 19/02/2017 : 10:11:00
|
It seems that for MIROSHNIKOV A. I., 2014.A review of the genus Clytellus Westwood, 1853, with notes on its systematic position and descriptions of eleven new species; Figs.25 & 26 it is Epipedocera undulata (Hope)= Epipedocera hardwickii (White, 1855)
On picture, I do not see differences. |
|
|
longyun
Member Demonax
China
60 Posts |
Posted - 29/07/2018 : 15:27:07
|
You mean he is wrong since cannot recognize hardwickii and vitalisi? It must be vitalisi here as they said. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12203 Posts |
Posted - 30/07/2018 : 10:26:22
|
quote: It must be vitalisi here as they said.
Do you have more informations ? Do you have a picture of the holotype of E. vitalisi ? |
|
|
longyun
Member Demonax
China
60 Posts |
Posted - 08/08/2018 : 04:02:39
|
I do not know who has it. But look at photos from Laos (vitalisi) and photos from Nepal or India. They are really different! |
|
|
|
Topic |
|