| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
USA
2219 Posts |
 Posted - 05/04/2016 : 00:21:17
|
 
128.92 KB
Grammographus notabilis cuneatus from Xaignabouri, Laos. |
Edited by - Xavier on 05/04/2016 07:43:30 |
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9420 Posts |
Posted - 05/04/2016 : 08:13:23
|
No, it is not: Demonax pseudonotabilis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970.
Now, tell me the differences with "Grammographus", if you can. |
 |
|
|
Larry Bezark
Member Macrodontia
USA
2219 Posts |
Posted - 05/04/2016 : 17:54:50
|
Thanks,
Larry B. |
|
|
|
nasa
Member Rosalia
China
960 Posts |
Posted - 05/04/2016 : 18:58:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by Francesco
Demonax pseudonotabilis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970.
Now, tell me the differences with "Grammographus", if you can.
Francesco, please don't be angry  . Here is the holotype of Demonax pseudonotabilis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970.
Is Demonax pseudonotabilis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970 a junior synonym of Grammographus notabilis notabilis (Pascoe,1862)?
The TITAN database shows Gressitt (1951: 280) transferred Chlorophorus notabilis = Grammographus notabilis to Demonax.
But TITAN database is wrong since Gressitt did not do that. I have told the truth to Tavakilian to correct the TITAN database. |
Edited by - nasa on 05/04/2016 18:58:57 |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9420 Posts |
Posted - 02/12/2017 : 09:59:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by nasa
Is Demonax pseudonotabilis Gressitt & Rondon, 1970 a junior synonym of Grammographus notabilis notabilis (Pascoe,1862)?
No, it is not.
I think that D. pseudonotabilis is the only valid species (besides D. notabilis and D. flavicollis) of this group.
Concerning D. notabilis, Thomson (1878) transferred C. notabilis to Grammophorus, but Gahan (1906) synonymised this genus with Demonax .
Nobody has revalidated Grammophorus for more than one century. |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Laos: Demonax pseudonotabilis
