| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
 Posted - 25/03/2017 : 00:19:16
|
200.4 KB
Peninsular Malaysia |
Edited by - Xavier on 13/01/2019 09:53:35 |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 25/03/2017 : 09:04:19
|
| It looks like a Glenida Gahan, 1888, but without tubers at side of pronotum, and with angular elytra apex ...So, a Glenea sp. ? |
Edited by - Xavier on 25/03/2017 09:04:32 |
 |
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 26/03/2017 : 14:11:37
|
Its mandible is bigger than most of Saperdini.
43.11 KB |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 26/03/2017 : 17:24:03
|
| Ok, it should belong to another genus... |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 27/03/2017 : 22:35:50
|
| Thank you, Xavier. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 28/03/2017 : 18:01:58
|
213.24 KB
To compare with Glenida cyaneofasciata Breuning, 1952,...
Same flat head with less strong mandibles, same antenna, same humeral ridge on elytra, but spined apex and no tooth(?) at pronotum.
Could you add a picture from side of pronotum ?
It is not a Glenida sp., so I wonder if it is a Glenea sp. ? A new genus and a new species to describe...? |
Edited by - Xavier on 29/03/2017 17:09:28 |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 29/03/2017 : 14:13:06
|
Pronotum
122.17 KB |
|
|
|
Gerard
Scientific Collaborator
France
5300 Posts |
Posted - 29/03/2017 : 16:55:08
|
Bonjour Shinichi, pour moi c'est nouveau.
Je ne connais pas ce genre, c'est entre les Stibara et les Glenea. |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1887 Posts |
Posted - 29/03/2017 : 19:29:28
|
| I have 3 specimens from Sabah that match. One male (large mandibles) and 2 females (smaller mandibles). No name. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 29/03/2017 : 19:37:54
|
| Could you add some pictures of a female, Dan ? |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1887 Posts |
Posted - 30/03/2017 : 13:47:12
|
| I can not take a good photograph with my camera. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 30/03/2017 : 17:49:37
|
Dear Shinichi,
Your species is none of the nine Glenida species, so it is a new one, and you should describe it ( quickly  ) in genus Glenida Gahan, 1888 . E. Vives has described ( Glenida dauberi Vives & Heffern, 2016 ) from Borneo which is very far from typical species of the genus ! . Your species is closer to "true" Glenida:
233.91 KB
Here a Glenida luteago Holzschuh, 2013 from Laos.
* apex of elytra is not rounded (like your species)
* 3 bumps on the pronotum (one at middle and longitudinal, and 2 others at side)
* tooth at side of pronotum : Glenida sulphurea Vives & Heffern, 2016 has no tooth at side of pronotum
* proeminent shoulders
* a ridge at side of elytron
* etc
Dan , it should be nice to see your specimens. |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 30/03/2017 : 23:01:25
|
Xavier, thank you for your kindly advice.
I intend to try. |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 31/03/2017 : 07:44:11
|
...but it is also possible that this species has been described by Pascoe, Gahan , etc, under the name " Glenea " because of apical spines...So you must check many text to go further.
For the subgenus, Glenea (Accolona) astathiformis Breuning, 1958 seems very close to your species. Have a look to specimens here and holotype here . |
Edited by - Xavier on 31/03/2017 07:52:02 |
|
|
|
Beckey
Member Rosalia
Japan
553 Posts |
Posted - 06/10/2018 : 01:57:37
|
| Glenea cyanura Gahan, 1907 |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12220 Posts |
Posted - 06/10/2018 : 10:58:30
|
Yes, it fits well with the description.
...and holotype picture is now available here. |
Edited by - Xavier on 13/01/2019 10:01:41 |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Malaysia: Glenea (s. str.) cyanura
