Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
Dusan
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Slovakia
101 Posts |
Posted - 18/01/2019 : 09:20:23
|
![](/public/imgforum/Dusan/201911892014_Laos1.JPG) 205.78 KB
Laos, Khammouane prov., size 11 mm. Can you help me with identification? |
Edited by - Xavier on 18/01/2019 17:29:27 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 18/01/2019 : 17:00:26
|
![](../public/imgforum/Xavier/20191181705_201911892014_Laos1.JPG) 191.9 KB ...just some light ![](images/icon_smile_wink.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 18/01/2019 : 17:19:05
|
It seems to be an Epepeotes from the group Epepeotes laosicus Breuning, 1965 / Epepeotes birmanus Breuning, 1969 / Epepeotes strandi (Breuning, 1935), close to this one and this one. |
Edited by - Xavier on 18/01/2019 17:29:08 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 18/01/2019 : 20:54:40
|
Hmmm. Reminds me of a Eundia! the size alone makes me doubt Epepeotes. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 19/01/2019 : 00:25:53
|
What is an Eundia ? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 19/01/2019 : 14:48:06
|
E u n i d i a .... sorry for the typo |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 19/01/2019 : 16:13:18
|
Ok, but why an Eunidia ? Eunidiini species look totally different, with a long 2nd antennomera...I do not understand. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 19/01/2019 : 23:03:14
|
I believe the scape of the antennae is not parallel to body.
Many Eunidia are rather drab species, too. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 19/01/2019 : 23:39:05
|
With the scape with an open scar, it is a Monochamini/Lamiini for me:
![](../public/imgforum/Xavier/2019119234028_20191181705_201911892014_Laos1.JPG) 30.39 KB |
Edited by - Xavier on 19/01/2019 23:41:57 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 10:04:39
|
Is it possible to have a frontal view of the head? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 10:11:20
|
My specimen here belongs to te same genus (or is the same species ?), with a frontal view of the head in the post. |
Edited by - Xavier on 20/01/2019 10:12:45 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 11:53:41
|
Ah, oui. With that trapezoidal forehead it should belong to the group of Agnia and relatives.
|
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 21:47:45
|
...but " Agnia" species haven't spines at pronotum.
What difference between this specimen and Epepeotes birmanus Breuning, 1969 here ? |
Edited by - Xavier on 20/01/2019 21:56:27 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 21:58:39
|
I know, but this is the old tribe of "Agniini" which also includes: Trichagnia Brn, Agniohammus Brn., Stegenodes Brn., Stegenus Pasc., Falsagnia Brn., Orsidis Pasc., Euthyastus Pasc., Pseudothyastus Brn., Acridocephala Chevr., Omocyrius Pasc., Hotarionomus Th., Achthophora Newm., Marmaroglypha Redt., Callipyrga Newm., Laelida Pasc., Combe Th., Pharsalia Th., Pericycos Brn., Triammatus Chevr., Myagrus Pasc., Peribasis Th., Parathyastus Aur., Xoes Pasc., etc.
C'est pour cela que continuer à parler de "Monochamini" n'a aucun sens. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12065 Posts |
Posted - 20/01/2019 : 22:37:19
|
Ok, so it is a Lamiini in the sense of the tribe on our forum ? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9416 Posts |
Posted - 21/01/2019 : 18:16:31
|
No, it is Lamiini in the sense of the international scientific community.
C.à.d. que soit claire: ce n'est pas que dans ce site on utilise une taxonomie particulière. On utilise la taxonomie reconnue suite des révisions taxonomiques mondiales, pas l'idée bizarre de quelques entomologistes qui s'est amusé a introduire des changements taxonomiques sur la base de sa misérable collection et de son encore plus misérable culture scientifique.
|
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|