Author |
Topic  |
|
Cuong Do
Member Purpuricenus
 
Vietnam
112 Posts |
Posted - 30/06/2011 : 06:13:49
|

Identified by Francesco! |
Edited by - Xavier on 30/01/2016 19:13:42 |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
    
Luxembourg
9511 Posts |
Posted - 08/07/2011 : 21:50:46
|
One moment! I said that this species is close related to X. latefasciatus. Actually, the true latefasciatus (from China) misses the narrow anterior yellow line, although it has similar colour, antennae and body shape. It seems that this species was described as variety of X. curticornis, but I do not manage to find news of this species. However, it should belong to the subgenus Xyloclytus. |
 |
|
Cuong Do
Member Purpuricenus
 
Vietnam
112 Posts |
Posted - 09/07/2011 : 14:05:57
|
Thanks Francesco, |
 |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
    
Luxembourg
9511 Posts |
Posted - 02/02/2012 : 13:26:32
|
Actually, it is just X. latefasciatus latefasciatus Pic, 1936. This species was described about specimens missing the anterior band, but is is only a variety. |
 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
    
France
12338 Posts |
Posted - 06/11/2013 : 11:45:11
|
To compare with the type in the forum's section, it is not this species but possibily X. curticornis, Pic 19.. ? I will add type's picture after finding the original publication. |
 |
|
|
Topic  |
|