Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
jplami
Member Rosalia
![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif)
France
656 Posts |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1907 Posts |
Posted - 07/09/2020 : 01:02:39
|
a good decision but there is still no taxonomic act to revalidate Zotale as a separate genus, or I don't know ? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 07/09/2020 : 07:42:23
|
I called my specimen from the same place Mycerinopsis (Zotale) parunicolor Breuning, 1964. I have to check that... |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 07/09/2020 : 12:39:26
|
Tavakilian will correct the valid genus in Titan database : Mycerinopsis (Zotale). |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
jplami
Member Rosalia
![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif) ![](images/icon_star_cyan.gif)
France
656 Posts |
Posted - 07/09/2020 : 19:57:37
|
In titan, I see Zotale !? But I don't find any act to revalidate Zotale : I'm ok with Mycerinopsis (Zotale).
Types of the taxa parunicolor and subunicolor are accessible. Mycerinopsis parunicolor does not present such spur on tibias.
So I keep: Mycerinopsis (Zotale) subunicolor Breuning, 1968.
|
Lamiaires du Monde Lamiines of the World Cerambycidae Lamiinae |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 07/09/2020 : 21:00:12
|
quote: Originally posted by jplami
In titan, I see Zotale !?
Yes, and as I said, it will be corrected in next version of Titan database. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 08/09/2020 : 06:58:22
|
quote: Originally posted by jplami
Types of the taxa parunicolor and subunicolor are accessible. Mycerinopsis parunicolor does not present such spur on tibias.
I have a female (here) , from the same locality, without spur on tibias : I think it is not a specific feature, but a sexual dimorphism ! |
Edited by - Xavier on 08/09/2020 07:03:15 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1907 Posts |
Posted - 09/09/2020 : 00:35:48
|
difficult to say if there is a sexual feature, f.e. in M. (Zotale) lineatus (Gahan, 1894) the male has no tibial spine, and maybe in Z. unicolor Pascoe, 1866 too (type species of Zotale), the picture is'nt useful to see that spine, but the type should be a male !
![](http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/../public/imgforum/Xaurus/20209903512_zotale_unicolor_HT_BMNH klein.JPG) 216.65 KB |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12095 Posts |
Posted - 09/09/2020 : 07:15:51
|
Ok, holotype of Mycerinopsis (Zotale) parunicolor Breuning, 1965 seems to be a male too. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|