Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12017 Posts |
Posted - 02/12/2020 : 15:08:01
|
![](/public/imgforum/Xavier/202012215635_MacrochenusLaos.JPG) 431.21 KB
25 mm. Laos (Houaphan) |
Edited by - Xavier on 02/12/2020 18:57:14 |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12017 Posts |
Posted - 02/12/2020 : 18:56:55
|
with Breuning revision, I rich Macrochenus assamensis Breuning, 1935. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1896 Posts |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12017 Posts |
Posted - 03/12/2020 : 07:01:25
|
![](http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/../public/imgforum/Xavier/202012365731_Macrochenusassamensis.jpg) 99.96 KB Laos(Luang Prabang). Here a male. Female above is a little dirty, but same white spots an bands, same inferior lobe eyes, etc.
I think that this one is Macrochenus tonkinensis, with different white bands on face, different lobe eyes, etc.
In Breuning revision: M.tonkinensis & M.assamensis quite similar, but:
inferior lobe eyes longer than cheek -> M.tonkinensis inferior lobe eyes as long as cheek -> M.assamensis |
Edited by - Xavier on 03/12/2020 07:31:15 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia
![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif) ![](images/icon_star_blue.gif)
Germany
1896 Posts |
Posted - 04/12/2020 : 01:44:31
|
yes, I agree, maybe anybody can provide a type picture of M. assamensis (BMNH) ! features like this mentioned by Breuning are not helpful for identifications ![](images/icon_smile_question.gif) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif) ![](images/icon_star_gold.gif)
Luxembourg
9412 Posts |
Posted - 04/12/2020 : 22:45:45
|
In my opinion, they are female and male of M. tonkinensis. M. assamensis is this specimen from Assam, well corresponding to these specimens.
You can read the description of tonkinensis here, p. 13 (373) |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|