Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Tmesisternini
 I.Jaya: Tmesisternus bizonulatus vs Roodenburgia
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1923 Posts

Posted - 25/10/2016 :  23:40:37  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Roodenburgia
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12213 Posts

Posted - 25/10/2016 :  23:44:26  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Do you know the author?
He describes another species in the same new genus ... I asked him his paper, but still no answer.
Go to Top of Page

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1923 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  00:45:51  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Yes, I know Gerrit well, we are been together in Westpapua already.
As I remember, he sent his manuscript to me at beginning of this year or last year, and I told him please don't publish this new genus with such disfigured and maybe immature spms. Obviously it's already publish, I don't know ?
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12213 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  06:37:29  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Yes, he published it in 2015, ...maybe you could ask him his paper to understand the definition of the new genus?
What about my specimen? Tmesisternus (trivittatus?) or Roodenburgia?
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12213 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  07:29:15  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
...and in Titan database, Tmesisternus trivitatus Guérin-Méneville, 1831 = Tmesisternus bizonulatus Guérin-Méneville, 1831
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12213 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  07:41:46  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
I just received the paper of Withaar (2015) (Merci Jean-Philippe ! ), and I read this :

<< The genus Roodenburgia gen. nov. differs from its sister genus Tmesisternus Latreille, 1829 in having deverging and wrinkled elytra.>>

Francesco, did you read this before ?

Edited by - Xavier on 26/10/2016 07:42:41
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9454 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  09:14:02  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Xavier

Francesco, did you read this before ?

No, I did not. There are two pictures on the Web here.

They are probably two immature specimens deformed by alcohol and successive drying. I observed the same phenomenon in some Prionus coriarius of our collection in Luxembourg.
Go to Top of Page

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
12213 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  09:41:41  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
I have also seen both pictures on internet before reading the paper but I could not imagine that deformed wings were the definition of a "new genus". You did!

By looking to my collection, I have many new genera
Go to Top of Page

Vitali
Member Rosalia

Estonia
994 Posts

Posted - 26/10/2016 :  10:08:03  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Francesco

They are probably two immature specimens deformed by alcohol and successive drying. I observed the same phenomenon in some Prionus coriarius of our collection in Luxembourg.

I am working with Uganda material collected by Malaise traps in alcohol.
If a special care about fixing elytra is not taken at drying the specimens, they all become new for science.
Incredible motivation for introducing new genera!
Go to Top of Page

Xaurus
Member Rosenbergia

Germany
1923 Posts

Posted - 27/10/2016 :  00:49:13  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
This was my attention before his publication, in his new paper there are also new sps in very bad condition, really difficult to recognize after description, especially in the genus Tmesisternus spms with a good tomentation are necessary for ID and for descriptions particularly.
According my opinion the new Ro(o)denburgia [valid is Rodenburgia] sps belong to T. trivittatus and T. oblongus, both are common ones in New Guinea.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07