Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Cerambycinae
 Cerambycini
 Kenya, Neoplocaderus: granulatus
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

horshehden
Member Purpuricenus

Czech Republic
424 Posts

Posted - 18/01/2012 :  21:51:49  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote


Neoplocaderus sp. ?
Kenya, Coast prov. Sagala Hills, December

horshehden
Member Purpuricenus

Czech Republic
424 Posts

Posted - 19/01/2012 :  11:52:38  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
It resembles me N. denticornis.
But my specimens from Oman have more distinct spines of antenna..
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9416 Posts

Posted - 19/01/2012 :  19:30:08  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
The species recorded in Oman is actually Neoplocaederus atlanticus (Rungs, 1952) (confront here).
This might be a female of Neoplocaederus granulatus (Aurivillius, 1909).
Are the elytra truncated or rounded at apex?
Go to Top of Page

horshehden
Member Purpuricenus

Czech Republic
424 Posts

Posted - 19/01/2012 :  19:59:12  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Well, Holzschuh (2003) stated for Saudi Arabia "Plocaederus atlanticus", type locality Rabat in Morocco, as a species significantly distinct from "Plocaederus denticornis" of tropical Africa. However, Sama (2000) put them into synonymy.
What is more interesting, in the recent Catalogue of Loebl & Smetana, there is N. denticornis (= atlanticus, etc.) with distribution only in OM,SA,YE.

Concerning my specimen from Kenya, it has rather truncated apex of elytra with small spines.
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9416 Posts

Posted - 19/01/2012 :  20:14:19  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Concerning Sama's synonymies I am a bit (= very) suspicious...
Actually, N. denticornis cannot be used in any cases, since it is a well-known unnecessary emendation for Lamia spinicornis Fabricius, 1781, as already Gahan noticed in 1890 (confront here, p. 3).
If this author makes errors like that, I can imagine the rest...


Concerning your beetle, I confirm granulatus.
Go to Top of Page

horshehden
Member Purpuricenus

Czech Republic
424 Posts

Posted - 19/01/2012 :  20:29:44  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Thank you!
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07