Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Cerambycinae
 Trachyderini
 Bolivia, Chydarteres dimidiatus dimidiatus
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Pierre
Member Rosenbergia

Switzerland
1755 Posts

Posted - 10/06/2012 :  21:55:22  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote


I found interesting to show here two extremely similar Trachyderini coming both from the same place in Bolivia.
This first one should be Chydarteres dimidiatus; what do you think about this?

Pierre
Member Rosenbergia

Switzerland
1755 Posts

Posted - 10/06/2012 :  21:56:57  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote

Second specimen.
Seizes: 19 mm the first, and 14 mm this one.
Go to Top of Page

Golofa
Member Purpuricenus

France
178 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  07:23:44  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Golofa's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Chydarteres dimidiatus boliviana
Alain
Go to Top of Page

Pierre
Member Rosenbergia

Switzerland
1755 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  11:55:30  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
A new form? A subspecies for each country?
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9431 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  12:48:50  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I do not know this boliviana.
They are both Chydarteres dimidiatus dimidiatus (Fabricius, 1787); the second specimen might be the var. scapularis Aurivillius, 1912.
Go to Top of Page

Golofa
Member Purpuricenus

France
178 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  12:52:02  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Golofa's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Sorry, boliviana is not accepted !
It is C.dimidiatus dimidiatus
Alain
Go to Top of Page

Pierre
Member Rosenbergia

Switzerland
1755 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  21:08:07  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
The eternal question about valid subspecies versus useless forms... this species is a good example. Highly various in its colour, where is the limit which designs a "good" subspecies?
Are altissimus, notatus, taeniatus real subspecies or could they also be simple examples of the chromatic variability of this species?
Do you have descriptions for these forms, Francesco?
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
9431 Posts

Posted - 11/06/2012 :  22:50:23  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
The problem may occur in presence of a scarce number of specimens, but large series can help to clarify this topic
If a bounded area is colonised by specimens having the same somatic characteristics, these specimens may be supposed to constitute a subspecies.
The problem might also be the difference among subspecies or natio (usually limited to an enclave very small localities, e.g. a forest)... or between subspecies or vicarious species.
Theoretically, vicarious species are not fecund between them, while subspecies are. This fact is verifiable in laboratory or (indirectly) by the presence of intermediate specimens in the neighbouring areas, which imply their inter-fecundity.

Concerning this genus, I have Hüdepohl's revision with descriptions, pictures and keys.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07