Author |
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12002 Posts |
Posted - 12/08/2012 : 11:22:14
|
20 mm (2 femelles), 15 mm (1 mâle). Hua Phan, nord Laos. Peut-être Necydalis concolor Niisato & Ohbayashi, 2004 ? |
Edited by - Xavier on 27/01/2016 00:29:33 |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 28/08/2012 : 22:51:32
|
Why do you think so? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12002 Posts |
Posted - 28/08/2012 : 23:28:00
|
I found a picture of it at an insect dealer, coming from Laos too ): . I've got no key to go farther... |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 29/08/2012 : 00:40:01
|
Probably, you mean az insect. There are some mistakes, as usually. My knowledge about Necydalis is very poor, but in this case, I guess, the correct name should be Necydalis (Necydalisca) concolor Niisato & Ohbayashi, 2004. Necydalisca should have: 1. long, flattend elytra; 2. broad and hardly convex abdomen; 3. slender tarsi. You can check it. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12002 Posts |
Posted - 29/08/2012 : 09:46:12
|
You're right , it's this dealer. Your 3 points work for my species, but is it enough to be sure of its name ? |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 29/08/2012 : 14:42:42
|
There is no other Necydalisca in the region. But looking at the photo it does not seem to me that the elytra are long (longer than in Necydalis) and tarsi slend. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12002 Posts |
Posted - 29/08/2012 : 18:58:30
|
I don't no what to say...impossible for me to compare without more material. Thanks Tom. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Petr Viktora
Member Nathrius
Czech Republic
28 Posts |
Posted - 04/09/2012 : 13:19:26
|
Necydalis concolor Niisato et Ohbayashi, 2004 |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 04/09/2012 : 15:49:12
|
Yes, this is the only black species described from the area...but I do not understand why it is a member of Necydalisca (it seems to me that on the photo, elytra are relatively short and tarsi realtively thick). |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif) ![](images/icon_star_bronze.gif)
France
12002 Posts |
Posted - 04/09/2012 : 19:22:42
|
Thanks a lot Petr Viktora for the confirmation. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
![](images/icon_star_red.gif) ![](images/icon_star_red.gif)
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 04/09/2012 : 19:35:53
|
I guess that the specimen of the dealer you used as a benchmark to find the name was determined by Petr, so there is no surprise. The question is why it was recorded as Necydalisca... |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
Petr Viktora
Member Nathrius
Czech Republic
28 Posts |
Posted - 05/09/2012 : 16:22:26
|
Hi Tom, I have orig. descriptions and it is really N. concolor. Why is included in the subgenus Necydalisca am unable to judge. |
![Go to Top of Page Go to Top of Page](images/icon_go_up.gif) |
|
|
Topic ![Next Topic Next Topic](images/icon_go_right.gif) |
|