T O P I C R E V I E W |
Gyula |
Posted - 15/03/2013 : 12:57:37 ![](/public/imgforum/Gyula/2013315125729_2 012.jpg) 379.01 KB
Irán, Emam koli 21 mm |
6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
znort |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 19:17:43 ok thank you francesco
|
Francesco |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 14:51:28 Cerambyx cinereus Fabricius, 1792 is preoccupied by Cerambyx cinereus DeGeer, 1775.
The name Diorthus simplex was validly used by Gahan (1906: 133); therefore, one of the conditions for the ICZN 23.9. (Reversal of precedence) can not be met. In fact, "the senior synonym or homonym has not been used as a valid name after 1899" (Art. 23.9.1.1.)
|
znort |
Posted - 18/03/2013 : 13:39:33 In Löbl & Smetana it's always cinereus.. Why you use simplex Francesco? |
Gyula |
Posted - 17/03/2013 : 06:43:31 thank you |
Francesco |
Posted - 16/03/2013 : 18:31:02 I agree, but the correct name is Diorthus simplex (White, 1853). |
znort |
Posted - 16/03/2013 : 16:26:45 I think it's probably Diorthus cinereus (Fabricius, 1792) |