| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| dryobius |
Posted - 30/01/2022 : 04:40:30
432.15 KB
Yen Bai, 14 mm |
| 10 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 09/03/2022 : 14:09:26
Interesting, I had left out this description. This subspecies, or variety ?, is not mentioned in the Titan database.
I have some specimens identified as Xylotrechus atronotatus Pic in my collection. To go further, I need to compare the genitalia of the males.
|
| Xaurus |
Posted - 11/02/2022 : 15:46:18
Pic, 1950 Coléoptères du globe (suite) L'Échange, Revue Linnéenne 66 (521) 9-12.
82.17 KB |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 02/02/2022 : 00:57:47
I found this sps in my database, but missing in Titan DB, I'll check if I have the description ? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 01/02/2022 : 06:56:32
I do not know what is Xylotrechus dureli (Pic, 1947). What is the title of Pic publication ? Nothing in Titan database & Biolib. |
| Xaurus |
Posted - 01/02/2022 : 01:18:49
difficult complex again, but I mean Xylotrechus dureli (Pic, 1947) not C. dureli Pic, 1950 -- my spms from Vietnam are determined by P. Viktora 2021 and match well with Dan's spm |
| Xavier |
Posted - 31/01/2022 : 13:19:30
140.71 KB
From Laos or Vietnam. I think that all of them are X.apiceinnotatus Pic |
| Xavier |
Posted - 31/01/2022 : 13:09:04
quote:
Originally posted by Xaurus
I think its X. dureli Pic, 1947 ?
X.dureli is a Chlorophorus |
| dryobius |
Posted - 31/01/2022 : 02:17:27
I have on X. apiceinnotatus from Laos identified by Holzschuh.
The only differences I see between my two specimens are the elytral markings. My Vietnamese specimen has the markings a little darker and more connected, and all the markings are located in similar locations on the elytra, compared to X. apiceinnotatus.
|
| Xaurus |
Posted - 31/01/2022 : 01:28:19
I think its X. dureli Pic, 1947 ? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 30/01/2022 : 09:09:37
Xylotrechus apiceinnotatus Pic, 1937 |
