| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 03/09/2018 : 12:17:07
   
I believe it is Rhapipodus manillae, but the spines in the legs confuse me...Can somebody help?
The first one is from Halimun Mt. JAWA W.
The second one from Salak Mt. JAWA W. |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Capitaine |
Posted - 09/09/2018 : 19:48:13
Oui, je dois y travailler, mais il me faut accéder à pas mal de matériel localisé assez loin de Toulouse !! pour pouvoir valider sa réintégration.
Pour ma part je reste sur mon opinion après examen de nombreux spécimens c'est à dire le nom de taxon "Rhaphipodus blumei Lansberge 1884" |
| Francesco |
Posted - 05/09/2018 : 20:33:42
Mais, en effet, j'en déjà parlé ici.
Il faut renommer tout les topics avant la parution de l'article (qui, pour ce qu'en je sais, n'a jamais été commencé). |
| Xavier |
Posted - 05/09/2018 : 15:24:12
In Titan database, valid name is Rhaphipodus suturalis Audinet-Serville, 1832.
Rhaphipodus blumei Lansberge, 1884 and Rhaphipodus suturalis var. blumei Lameere, 1919 for the 2 other choices...
|
| Francesco |
Posted - 05/09/2018 : 14:47:42
quote:
Originally posted by SDevesa
It seems there are some problems to insert the ventral view. I will try again...
There were parentheses in the names of the files. |
| Capitaine |
Posted - 04/09/2018 : 14:03:54
Si, definitivamente |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 03/09/2018 : 17:13:50
Thank a lot, Claude.
I understand that they are male and female? |
| Capitaine |
Posted - 03/09/2018 : 14:25:07
459.5 KB
So, there's no need to see a ventral view. These specimens (male and female) are a black form of Rhaphipodus blumei (R. suturalis var blumei for some authors).
Mt Halimum is typical area for this species form.
here an other specimen from this area |
| Capitaine |
Posted - 03/09/2018 : 14:17:11
Check your picture title (no space between words) |
| SDevesa |
Posted - 03/09/2018 : 13:26:08
It seems there are some problems to insert the ventral view. I will try again... |
