| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Andre
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1693 Posts |
 Posted - 09/03/2013 : 12:32:40
|
59.1 KB
Borneo Trus Madi,
Male, 16mm.
With distinctly extension to meso- und metatibia. |
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12093 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 12:49:16
|
There are 3 species in HOLZSCHUH Carolus, 2005, Beschreibung von neuen Bockkäfern aus SE Asien, vorwiegend aus Borneo (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Les Cahiers Magellanes 46: 1-40, 31 figs.
Did you verify?? (me, I can't read German  ) |
Edited by - Xavier on 09/03/2013 12:51:32 |
 |
|
|
Andre
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1693 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 13:04:53
|
| Hallo Xavier, my literatur is very incomplete. Have you the PDF? |
|
|
|
Xavier
Scientific Collaborator
France
12093 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 13:16:10
|
Have a look to your boxmail and reply me  |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 16:09:21
|
It looks to me like Xoanodera vitticollis.
I have all the Xoanodera from Sabah in my collection, and I have photographs too. X. interrupta Pic looks similar. |
|
|
|
Andre
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1693 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 17:55:50
|
In the description of X. suturella Holzschuh, 2005 (thank you Xavier!!!), this spec. is compared with vitticollis and interrupta.
According to this, interrupta is marked by very kinky meso- and metatibia (male) and a small stripe after the scutellum.
In BioLib, X. interrupta is a synonym of vitticollis (according to Gressit & Rondon, 1970).
Male metatibia (sublateral). |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 19:54:33
|
I have vitticollis and interrupta and they are different.
The tibiae are distinct and this would then appear to be X. interrupta. |
|
|
|
Andre
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1693 Posts |
Posted - 09/03/2013 : 21:42:28
|
| Thank you Dan, I agree with you. |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9420 Posts |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 08:33:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Andre
In BioLib, X. interrupta is a synonym of vitticollis (after Gressit & Rondon, 1970).
I have noticed that the Titan Base provides the same synonymy.
Have the data already been updated by new taxonomic papers?
If not, I have to identify this species as vitticollis... |
|
|
|
Andre
Member Rosenbergia
Germany
1693 Posts |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 15:30:42
|
120.37 KB
Here a X. vitticollis / Borneo det. by A. Weigel (left site) and a Male / Borneo, determined by myself with normally legs.
In Holzschuh 2005: "Beine beim Male (X. suturella) normal gebildet - wie bei vitticollis" = "Legs normally formed - alike as vitticollis".
I`m sure C. Holzschuh has seen the type of the two spec. |
|
|
|
dryobius
Member Rosenbergia
USA
1885 Posts |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 15:38:55
|
the titan database lists "vitticollis" under the nominate subgenus and also under "Lajoyeia" 
I thought Holzschuh published the new status of "interrupta" but maybe I have made a premature statement in my Borneo catalog. The fact is that the two species are different, and I will ask Holzschuh about formalizing the new status. |
|
|
|
Francesco
Forum Admin
Luxembourg
9420 Posts |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 17:04:58
|
You are right: the metatibiae are completely different!
I go to change BioLib... I can consider it as "not accepted synonymy" |
|
|
|
horshehden
Member Purpuricenus
Czech Republic
424 Posts |
Posted - 10/03/2013 : 18:18:29
|
quote:
Originally posted by dryobius
The fact is that the two species are different, and I will ask Holzschuh about formalizing the new status.
It is a long time ago - check Holzschuh (1999). |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Borneo Xoanodera: interrupta vs vitticollis
